Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
3.
Annals of Oncology ; 33:S1078, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2041545

ABSTRACT

Background: In first line (L1) for EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC), osimertinib (osi) has been the preferred option since 2018. First generation anti-EGFR TKI (1G) alone followed by osi, or 1G + anti-angiogenic or 1G + chemotherapy are other options. We aimed to assess the subgroups of patients (pts) that do not benefit from 1G alone compared with osimertinib L1 in mEGFR aNSCLC. Methods: Retrospective international study including pts with mEGFR aNSCLC treated with either osi or the sequence of 1G followed by osi (seq group). Primary endpoint was the PFS of the global strategy (PFSglob) defined as the time between L1 start and progression after L2 treatment or death. Subgroups analyses included pts with high tumour burden (high-TM;> 3 metastatic sites and/or central nervous system (CNS) involvement), poor performance status (PS), and T790M negative (seq subgroup only). Results: A total of 235 pts were included: 104 in the seq group, 118 in the osi L1 group. 15 had T790M negative at PD after 1G, they received osi as a therapeutic test. From these pts, 222 had an exon19 or 21 EGFR mut, 13 had uncommon mEGFR. Mean age was 65 years, 64% were female, and 60% never smokers. Pts from the osi L1 group had poorer PS (23% vs 10%), higher rate of co-mutations (23% vs 19%) and more CNS involvement (47% vs 19%). After a median (m) follow up of 30.6 months in the exon 19 and 21 population, mPFSglob was 27.4 mo (23.0-31.0) and mPFS L1 was 15.5mo (13.7-18.4) Table. The sequence was associated with shorter PFS L1 compared with osi L1 particularly in high-TM (10.5 mo vs 17.1 mo, p<0.0001);PFS was numerically shorter in poor PS (≥2) population (11.0 mo vs 15.6 mo, p=0.1). [Formula presented] Conclusions: 1G TKI followed by osi seemed to be detrimental compared with os L1 for pts with high-TM or poor PS mEGFR aNSCLC. In this population, the intensification of L1 treatment with osimertinib or a combination of 1G with anti-angiogenic or chemotherapy could be the better option in the first-line setting. Updated results will be presented at the congress. Legal entity responsible for the study: Institut Gustave Roussy. Funding: Has not received any funding Disclosure: E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi, Amgen. N. Girard: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Mirati, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Boehringer, Novartis, Sanofi, AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Grunenthal, Takeda, Owkin;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Local: Roche, Sivan, Janssen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Officer, International Thymic malignancy interest group, president: ITMIG;Other, Other, Family member is an employee: AstraZeneca. M.T. Moran Bueno: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory role: Roche. B. Besse: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Onxeo, Ose Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai Pharmaceutical, EISAI, Genzyme Corporation, Inivata, Ipsen, Turning Point Therapeutics. L. Mezquita: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda, AstraZeneca, Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, SEOM Beca Retorno 2019: BI;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, ESMO TR Research Fellowship 2019: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, COVID research Grant: Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Inivata, Stilla. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

4.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2005653

ABSTRACT

Background: Inflammation and neutrophils play a central role in severe Covid-19 disease. In previous data, we showed that the FLARE score, combining both tumor and Covid-19-induced proinflammatory status (proinflamstatus), predicts early mortality in cancer patients (pts) with Covid-19 infection. We aimed to assess the impact of this score in a larger cohort and characterize the immunophenotype (IF) of circulating neutrophils. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort (RC) of pts with cancer and Covid-19 infection across 14 international centers. Circulating inflammatory markers were collected at two timepoints: baseline (-15 to -45d before Covid-19 diagnosis) and Covid-19 diagnosis. Tumor-induced proinflam-status was defined by high dNLR (neutrophils/(leucocytes-neutrophils)> 3) at baseline. Covid-19-induced proinflam-status was defined by +100% increase of dNLR between both timepoints. We built the FLARE score combining both Tumor and Infection-induced inflammation: T+/I+ (poor), if both proinflam-status;T+/I- (T-only), if inflammation only due to tumor;T-/I+ (I-only), if inflammation only due to Covid;T-/I- (favorable), if no proinflam-status. The IF of circulating neutrophils by flow cytometry was determined in a unicenter prospective cohort (PC) of pts with cancer during Covid-19 infection and in healthy volunteers (HV). Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Results: 524 pts were enrolled in the RC with a median follow- up of 84d (95%CI 78-90). Median age was 69 (range 35-98), 52% were male and 78% had baseline PS <1.Thoracic cancers were the most common (26%). 70% had active disease, 51% advanced stage and 57% were under systemic therapy. dNLR was high in 25% at baseline vs 55% at Covid-19 diagnosis. The median dNLR increase between both timepoints was +70% (IQR: 0-349%);42% had +100% increase of dNLR. Pts distribution and mortality across FLARE groups is resumed in the Table. Overall mortality rate was 26%. In multivariate analysis, including gender, stage and PS, the FLARE poor group was independently associated with 30-day mortality [OR 5.27;1.37-20.3]. 44 pts were enrolled in the PC. Median circulating neutrophils were higher in pts with cancer (n=10, 56.7% [IQR: 39-78.4%]) vs HV (n=6, 35.8% [IQR: 25.6-21%]), and particularly higher in pts with cancer and severe Covid-19 infection (n=7, 88.6% [IQR: 80.9-94%] (p=0.003). A more comprehensive characterization of the IF of circulating neutrophils, including Lox1/CD62/CD64, will be presented at ASCO. Conclusions: The FLARE score, combining tumor and Covid-19-induced proinflam-status, can identify the population at higher risk for mortality. A better characterization of circulating neutrophils may help improve the prediction of Covid-19 outcomes in pts with cancer. (Table Presented).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL